Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131 uygulayarak t\u00fcrbanla \u00fcniversitelere girmek isteyen \u00f6\u011frencileri uyard\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tutanak tuttu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan davada ceza alan ve bir s\u00fcre cezaevinde kalan Prof. Dr. Rennan Pek\u00fcnl\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn avukat\u0131 Murat Fatih \u00dclk\u00fc, yarg\u0131lanman\u0131n yenilenmesi talebinde bulundu.<\/p>\n
Av. \u00dclk\u00fc, tipik bir kumpas davas\u0131 olan Rennan Pek\u00fcnl\u00fc dosyas\u0131nda mahkumiyet karar\u0131 veren hakimler ve yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde g\u00f6rev alan savc\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda FET\u00d6\/PDY soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle b\u00f6yle bir talepte bulunduklar\u0131n\u0131 belirterek bir bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 da haz\u0131rlad\u0131. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n metnini sunuyoruz.<\/p>\n
BASIN A\u00c7IKLAMASI<\/strong><\/p>\n
1) Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere, astronomi profes\u00f6r\u00fc Esat Rennan Pek\u00fcnl\u00fc, Anayasa\u2019y\u0131, Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131 uygulamak istedi, t\u00fcrbanla \u00fcniversitelere girmek isteyen \u00f6\u011frencileri uyard\u0131 ve tutanak tuttu diye, 2 y\u0131l 1 ay hapis cezas\u0131 alm\u0131\u015f, karar kesinle\u015fmi\u015f, sonras\u0131nda da Prof. Pek\u00fcnl\u00fc cezaevine girmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
2) 15 Temmuz 2016 gecesi ya\u015fanan, darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fc sonras\u0131 \u00fclke genelinde FET\u00d6\/PDY \u00fcyesi olarak de\u011ferlendirilen \u00e7ok say\u0131da askeri personel, emniyet g\u00f6revlisi ve yarg\u0131 mensubu g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca yarg\u0131 mensuplar\u0131 dahil binlerce kamu g\u00f6revlisi g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3) Bu kapsamda, yaz\u0131l\u0131\/g\u00f6rsel medyaya yans\u0131yan haberlerden \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fimiz kadar\u0131yla;<\/p>\n
– San\u0131k hakk\u0131ndaki mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131 veren, yerel mahkeme (\u0130zmir 4. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi hakimi)<\/p>\n
– Mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn onanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karara (karar 4\u2019e kar\u015f\u0131 1 oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla verilmi\u015ftir.) kat\u0131lan d\u00f6nemin Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2 \u00fcyesi;<\/p>\n
– Mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn taraf\u0131m\u0131zdan temyiz edilmesi sonras\u0131, dosyan\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na geli\u015finden itibaren 17 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn onanmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde tebli\u011fname haz\u0131rlayan Yarg\u0131tay Savc\u0131s\u0131;<\/p>\n
– Mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesi sonras\u0131, taraf\u0131m\u0131zdan yap\u0131lan karar d\u00fczeltme talebi ile ilgili olarak, \u201ckarar d\u00fczeltme yoluna gidilmeme\u201d karar\u0131n\u0131 veren d\u00f6nemin Yarg\u0131tay Savc\u0131s\u0131;<\/p>\n
– Yarg\u0131lamadan \u00f6nce soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda Ege \u00dcniversitesi Rekt\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan verilen l\u00fczum-u muhakeme karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin karara (karar 3\u2019e kar\u015f\u0131 2 oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.) kat\u0131lan d\u00f6nemin Dan\u0131\u015ftay 1. Dairesi\u2019nin 1 \u00fcyesi hakk\u0131nda, HSYK taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131rma (a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa alma) karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi gibi, Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131\/soru\u015fturmalar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131 (yakalama) karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4) FET\u00d6\/PDY\u2019nin yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131ndaki yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 ve faaliyetlerini de k\u0131saca a\u00e7\u0131klamak gerekirse;<\/p>\n
– \u201cFET\u00d6\/PDY\u2019nin bilhassa (yak\u0131n d\u00f6neme kadar faaliyette olan) \u00f6zel yetkili mahkemelerde ve savc\u0131l\u0131klarda \u00f6rg\u00fctlendi\u011fi, yarg\u0131 ve emniyet i\u00e7erisindeki mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn imamlar\u0131ndan ald\u0131klar\u0131 talimatlar uyar\u0131nca ve \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda hareket ettikleri, bu kapsamda ciddi hukuki sorunlar i\u00e7eren uygulamalar yapt\u0131klar\u0131 kamuoyunda uzun s\u00fcredir tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.\u201d[1]<\/p>\n
– \u201cBu ba\u011flamda Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 6\/6\/2016 tarihli iddianamesinde, yarg\u0131 i\u00e7inde FET\u00d6\/PDY\u2019nin \u00f6nemli bir kadrosunun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne, yap\u0131lanman\u0131n istedi\u011finde her t\u00fcrl\u00fc hukuksuz karar\u0131 verecek ve yarg\u0131 eliyle kamu g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6rg\u00fct menfaatine kullanacak binlerce hakim ve savc\u0131 mensubunun bulundu\u011funa de\u011finilmi\u015f; son y\u0131llarda kamuoyu taraf\u0131ndan yak\u0131ndan takip edilen bir\u00e7ok olaya ili\u015fkin soru\u015fturma ve yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinin FET\u00d6\/PDY\u2019nin yarg\u0131 te\u015fkilat\u0131 i\u00e7erisindeki mensuplar\u0131nca bu \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ama\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda ve yarg\u0131 imamlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilen talimatlar uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu s\u00fcre\u00e7lerde bilin\u00e7li olarak hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 uygulamalarda bulunuldu\u011fu iddia edilmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda \u201c\u015eemdinli\u201d, \u201cErgenekon\u201d, \u201cBalyoz\u201d, \u201cAskeri Casusluk\u201d, \u201cDevrimci Kararg\u00e2h\u201d, \u201cOda TV\u201d ve \u201c\u015eike\u201d davalar\u0131 gibi kamuoyunda yo\u011fun tart\u0131\u015fmalara neden olan bir\u00e7ok davay\u0131 ba\u015fta TSK olmak \u00fczere farkl\u0131 kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131ndaki \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubu olmayan kamu g\u00f6revlilerini tasfiye etmek ve farkl\u0131 sivil \u00e7evrelerde \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ki\u015fileri etkisizle\u015ftirmek amac\u0131yla kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.\u201d[2]<\/p>\n
– \u201c\u00a0Yukar\u0131da belirtilen iddialara ili\u015fkin olarak FET\u00d6\/PDY\u2019ye mensup oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen baz\u0131 yarg\u0131 mensuplar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda H\u00e2kimler ve Savc\u0131lar Y\u00fcksek Kurulu (HSYK) taraf\u0131ndan disiplin soru\u015fturmalar\u0131 yap\u0131larak meslekten \u00e7\u0131karma cezalar\u0131 verilmi\u015f ayr\u0131ca adli mercilerce de soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturmalar yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u201d[3]<\/p>\n
5) Rennan Pek\u00fcnl\u00fc dosyas\u0131na bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda;<\/p>\n
I) Davayla ilgili temel hukuksal ger\u00e7ekler, dosya kapsam\u0131, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7laman\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fi de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi hukuken olanaks\u0131z oldu\u011fu halde, mahkumiyet karar\u0131na kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hakim\/hakimler (ve yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f beyan etmi\u015f\/i\u015flevde bulunmu\u015f savc\u0131\/savc\u0131lar), i\u00e7indeki bulunduklar\u0131 yap\u0131lanman\u0131n istedikleri ve ama\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda, tamamen hukuksuz bir karar vermi\u015fler ve b\u00f6ylece yarg\u0131 eliyle kamu g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fc FET\u00d6\/PDY yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 menfaatine kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
II) San\u0131k hakk\u0131ndaki mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fi, kamuoyuna, hukuk d\u00fcnyas\u0131na, akademik (\u00fcniversite) ortama yans\u0131ma bi\u00e7imi ve bu kararla elde edilen sonu\u00e7lar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, san\u0131k hakk\u0131ndaki mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n; \u201cT\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Devletinin t\u00fcm anayasal kurumlar\u0131n\u0131 (yasama, y\u00fcr\u00fctme, yarg\u0131 erklerini) ele ge\u00e7irmeyi ve bundan sonra devleti, toplumu ve fertleri kendi ideolojisi do\u011frultusunda yeniden \u015fekillendirerek oligar\u015fik \u00f6zellikler ta\u015f\u0131yan bir z\u00fcmre eliyle ekonomik, toplumsal ve siyasal g\u00fcc\u00fc y\u00f6netme\u201d[4] amac\u0131na y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu hemen anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III) Mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn;<\/p>\n
– San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda Anayasa h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131, Dan\u0131\u015ftay kararlar\u0131, A\u0130HM kararlar\u0131 ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u201chukuk devleti\u201d ve \u201chukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u201d ilkeleri yok say\u0131larak, kendisini Anayasa h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden ve Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nden \u00fcstte g\u00f6ren bir anlay\u0131\u015fla,<\/p>\n
– Davay\u0131 yak\u0131ndan izleyen kamuoyu, hukuk \u00e7evreleri ve akademik ortamda, \u201cAnayasa h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini, Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131, yani hukuku uygulamak isteyen, hukukun yan\u0131nda, hukuka g\u00fcvenen, hi\u00e7bir su\u00e7 i\u015flememi\u015f bir profes\u00f6r cezaevine giriyorsa, biz de \u2018hukuken g\u00fcvende de\u011filiz\u2019\u201d alg\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 ve yarg\u0131 eliyle \u201ckorku imparatorlu\u011fu\u201d ortam\u0131n\u0131 yaratmak amac\u0131yla,<\/p>\n
– FET\u00d6\/PDY yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n devleti, toplumu ve fertleri kendi ideolojisi do\u011frultusunda yeniden \u015fekillendirme amac\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 direnecek ki\u015filere ve kitlelere g\u00f6zda\u011f\u0131 vermek amac\u0131yla verildi\u011fi son derece a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
IV) San\u0131k hakk\u0131ndaki dava ve mahkumiyet karar\u0131; t\u00fcm kamuoyunda, hukuksuz bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kabul edilen ve \u201ckumpas davalar\u0131\u201d olarak nitelendirilen, masum insanlar\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n ama\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda cezaevine at\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131, g\u00f6revlerinden tasfiye edildikleri, kamuoyunun g\u00f6z\u00fcnde pe\u015finen mahkum edildikleri, \u201cErgenekon\u201d, \u201cBalyoz\u201d, \u201cAskeri Casusluk\u201d, \u201cDevrimci Kararg\u00e2h\u201d, \u201cOda TV\u201d, \u201c\u015eike\u201d vb. davalar\u0131 ile tamamen ayn\u0131 konumdad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
FET\u00d6\/PDY yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n; \u201cT\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Devletinin t\u00fcm anayasal kurumlar\u0131n\u0131 (yasama, y\u00fcr\u00fctme, yarg\u0131 erklerini) ele ge\u00e7irmeyi ve bundan sonra devleti, toplumu ve fertleri kendi ideolojisi do\u011frultusunda yeniden \u015fekillendirerek oligar\u015fik \u00f6zellikler ta\u015f\u0131yan bir z\u00fcmre eliyle ekonomik, toplumsal ve siyasal g\u00fcc\u00fc y\u00f6netme\u201d[5] amac\u0131na uygun olarak, FET\u00d6\/PDY yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n ama\u00e7lar\u0131na engel olabilecek kamu g\u00f6revlilerini tasfiye etmek, etkisizle\u015ftirmek hedefi[6] \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde bu mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc \u00fcretilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6) Uluslararas\u0131 \u00e7apta bir \u00fcne sahip, akademik \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 ile tan\u0131nan bir astronomi profes\u00f6r\u00fcne; Anayasa h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n, k\u0131sacas\u0131 hukukun uygulanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in; t\u00fcrbanla \u00fcniversiteye girmek isteyen \u00f6\u011frencileri uyard\u0131\u011f\u0131, girenler hakk\u0131nda tutanak tuttu\u011fu i\u00e7in; hi\u00e7bir \u00f6\u011frenciyi, kimseyi engellemedi\u011fi halde; \u015fikayet\u00e7i \u00f6\u011frencinin herhangi bir devams\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fcniversite resmi kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ile de sabit oldu\u011fu halde; hem de alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015f\u0131larak, cezaevine girmesini sa\u011flayacak bi\u00e7imde 2 y\u0131l\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcnde hapis cezas\u0131 verilmesi, mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n tamamen hukuksuz ve belirli bir ama\u00e7 do\u011frultusunda verildi\u011fini g\u00f6stermektedir.<\/p>\n
7) Bu nedenle, kamuoyunda bilindi\u011fi bi\u00e7imiyle tipik bir kumpas davas\u0131 olan ve son FET\u00d6\/PDY soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda hakk\u0131nda i\u015flem yap\u0131lan 4 hakim ve 2 savc\u0131n\u0131n mahkumiyet karar\u0131 s\u00fcrecine kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 Rennan Pek\u00fcnl\u00fc dosyas\u0131nda yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi talebinde bulunuyor, Rennan Pek\u00fcnl\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn yeniden yarg\u0131lanarak, \u201cberaat\u201d karar\u0131 verilmesini talep ediyoruz.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Dipnotlar<\/strong><\/p>\n
[1] Anayasa Mahkemesi Genel Kurulu\u2019nun 04.08.2016 tarih Esas:2016\/6 (De\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u015fler) Karar: 2016\/12 say\u0131l\u0131 \u201cAnayasa Mahkemesi \u00fcyeleri Alparslan Altan ve Erdal Tercan\u2019\u0131n meslekten \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131<\/p>\n
[2] Dipnot 1\u2019de yer alan Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131<\/p>\n
[3] Dipnot 1\u2019de yer alan Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131<\/p>\n
[4] Dipnot 1\u2019de yer alan Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131<\/p>\n
[5] Dipnot 1\u2019de yer alan Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131<\/p>\n
[6] Dipnot 1\u2019de yer alan Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131<\/p>\n
Esat Rennan Pek\u00fcnl\u00fc Vekili Av. Murat Fatih \u00dclk\u00fc <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131 uygulayarak t\u00fcrbanla \u00fcniversitelere girmek isteyen \u00f6\u011frencileri uyard\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tutanak tuttu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan davada ceza alan ve bir s\u00fcre cezaevinde kalan Prof. Dr. Rennan Pek\u00fcnl\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn avukat\u0131 Murat Fatih \u00dclk\u00fc, yarg\u0131lanman\u0131n yenilenmesi talebinde bulundu. Av. \u00dclk\u00fc, tipik bir kumpas davas\u0131 olan Rennan Pek\u00fcnl\u00fc dosyas\u0131nda mahkumiyet karar\u0131 veren hakimler ve yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde g\u00f6rev alan […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":429,"featured_media":14882,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[188,535],"tags":[1702,832,1701,394],"class_list":["post-14881","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-151-sayi","category-forum","tag-anayasa-mahkemesi","tag-dava","tag-turban","tag-universite"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14881","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/429"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14881"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14881\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14882"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14881"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14881"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14881"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}