{"id":8736,"date":"2004-03-01T00:29:22","date_gmt":"2004-02-29T22:29:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/109.232.216.219\/~bilimvegelecek\/?p=8736"},"modified":"2020-04-16T11:26:04","modified_gmt":"2020-04-16T08:26:04","slug":"ikili-sarmalin-golgede-kalmis-kadin-kahramani-rosalind-franklin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/2004\/03\/01\/ikili-sarmalin-golgede-kalmis-kadin-kahramani-rosalind-franklin","title":{"rendered":"\u0130kili sarmal\u0131n g\u00f6lgede kalm\u0131\u015f kad\u0131n kahraman\u0131: Rosalind Franklin"},"content":{"rendered":"

DNA yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesinde hep iki isim an\u0131l\u0131r: Watson ve Crick. Oysa g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilen bir ba\u015fka isim daha vard\u0131r: Rosalind Franklin. Yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 katk\u0131 unutturulmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, hatta giderek a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Erkekler d\u00fcnyas\u0131n\u0131n kurban\u0131 olmu\u015ftur bu kad\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131rmac\u0131…<\/em><\/p>\n

Prof. Dr. Benan Din\u00e7t\u00fcrk
\n<\/strong>\u0130T\u00dc Molek\u00fcler Biyoloji ve Genetik M\u00fchendisli\u011fi B\u00f6l\u00fcm Ba\u015fkan\u0131<\/p>\n

\"\"
Rosalind Franklin<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

1953 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Nisan ay\u0131nda Nature<\/em> dergisinde yay\u0131mlanan tek sayfal\u0131k bir makale, genetik biliminin y\u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fc de\u011fi\u015ftirdi. Makale Watson-Crick sarmal\u0131 olarak an\u0131lan DNA’n\u0131n yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131yor ve bu yap\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurularak DNA’n\u0131n kendini e\u015flemesiyle ilgili bir mekanizma \u00f6neriliyordu. Makale, Cambridge Cavendish Laboratuvar\u0131’ndan James Watson ve Francis Crick’e bir Nobel \u00d6d\u00fcl\u00fc kazand\u0131rd\u0131. Nobel \u00d6d\u00fcl\u00fc’n\u00fc payla\u015fan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir ki\u015fi ise Londra King’s Koleji’nden Maurice Wilkins’di. Ancak DNA’n\u0131n yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesinde g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilen ba\u015fka bir isim daha vard\u0131.<\/p>\n

Francis Crick 1953 Mart’\u0131nda yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 mektupta ondan “karanl\u0131k han\u0131mefendi” diye s\u00f6z etmi\u015fti. James Watson ise 1968’te yay\u0131mlanan \u0130kili Sarmal<\/em> kitab\u0131nda “g\u00f6zl\u00fcklerini \u00e7\u0131karsa ve sa\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n modelini de\u011fi\u015ftirse g\u00fczel olabilirdi” \u015feklinde yaz\u0131yordu. Bu tan\u0131mlamalar\u0131n \u00f6znesi Rosalind Franklin, DNA’n\u0131n yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesini sa\u011flayan X-\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131r\u0131n\u0131m\u0131 y\u00f6ntemini uygulayan bir fizikokimyac\u0131d\u0131r. DNA’n\u0131n o g\u00fcne ve hatta g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcze de\u011fin \u00e7ekilen en net kristal foto\u011fraf\u0131d\u0131r bu.<\/p>\n

1953 y\u0131l\u0131nda James Watson ve Francis Crick taraf\u0131ndan alelacele yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f tek sayfal\u0131k bir makalede, DNA’n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7 boyutlu yap\u0131s\u0131 ve kendini e\u015fleme mekanizmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klan\u0131yordu. Bu makalenin yaz\u0131lmas\u0131, yani DNA yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesi Rosalind Franklin’in \u00e7ekti\u011fi X-\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131r\u0131n\u0131m\u0131 foto\u011fraf\u0131n\u0131n, haberi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n, Maurice Wilkins taraf\u0131ndan James Watson’a g\u00f6sterilmesiyle m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmu\u015ftu. Rosalind Franklin’in 37 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki kanser nedeniyle \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden 5 y\u0131l sonra, 1962’de Nobel \u00d6d\u00fcl\u00fc Watson, Crick ve Wilkins aras\u0131nda payla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

Laboratuvarda kad\u0131n olmak
\n<\/em><\/strong>Bir t\u00fcrl\u00fc y\u0131ld\u0131zlar\u0131 bar\u0131\u015fmayan Wilkins ve Franklin, John Randall’\u0131n laboratuar\u0131nda tan\u0131\u015f\u0131rlar. Wilkins laboratuvar\u0131n eskisidir, Franklin daha sonra kat\u0131l\u0131r. DNA yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ne oldu\u011fu problemi ise Randall Laboratuvar\u0131’na ait bir problemdir; Wilkins’e ait bir problem de\u011fildir. Franklin de, daha \u00f6nceki X-\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131r\u0131n\u0131m\u0131 tekni\u011findeki deneyimi nedeniyle gruba kat\u0131l\u0131r. Pek \u00e7ok kaynakta Franklin, Wilkins’in asistan\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir. Oysa ikisi de e\u015fit konumda, farkl\u0131 alanlarda birikimi olan iki ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eimdiki deyi\u015fle ikisi de Randall’\u0131n grubunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan doktora sonras\u0131 (postdoc) ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131lard\u0131r ve k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck birer grup idare etmektedirler. Franklin’in de Wilkins’in de doktora \u00f6\u011frencileri vard\u0131r. Ancak pek \u00e7ok kaynak, Franklin’i, Maurice Wilkins’in inat\u00e7\u0131, dedi\u011fi dedik, huysuz asistan\u0131 olarak g\u00f6stermek istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

1951-53 y\u0131llar\u0131n\u0131n Londra’s\u0131nda bir kad\u0131n\u0131n laboratuvarda ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 olmas\u0131 olduk\u00e7a y\u00fcrek isteyen bir i\u015fti. O d\u00f6nemde kad\u0131nlar\u0131n laboratuvardaki yeri teknisyenlikten \u00f6teye gitmiyordu ve ondan fazlas\u0131 kabul edilmiyordu. Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 olmaya c\u00fcret ettiyse, “normal” bir kad\u0131n de\u011fildi zaten. O y\u0131llar \u00fcniversite yemek salonlar\u0131 sadece erkeklerin girebildikleri birer kul\u00fcp odas\u0131na benzerdi. Yo\u011fun bir laboratuvar ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131lar, sadece erkeklerin girebildi\u011fi publara giderlerdi. B\u00f6yle bir ortam i\u00e7inde Rosalind Franklin’e bi\u00e7ilen rol \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 de\u011fil. \u00dcstelik Franklin, deneysel veriyle konu\u015fan, spek\u00fclasyonlarla u\u011fra\u015fmayan, inand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sonuna dek savunan bir bilim insan\u0131yd\u0131. Hele bu tavr\u0131, erkeklerin d\u00fcnyas\u0131 olan ara\u015ft\u0131rma ortam\u0131na hi\u00e7 uygun de\u011fildi.<\/p>\n

Watson ve Crick, foto\u011fraf\u0131 nas\u0131l g\u00f6rd\u00fc?
\n<\/em><\/strong>James Watson’un, laboratuvardaki g\u00fcnl\u00fck ya\u015fam ve rekabetlerin de anlat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Crick dahil pek \u00e7ok arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n \u015fa\u015fk\u0131nl\u0131k ve k\u0131rg\u0131nl\u0131kla kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kitab\u0131 Double Helix’de (\u0130kili Sarmal<\/em>), Rosalind Franklin korkun\u00e7 bir karakter olarak tasvir ediliyordu.<\/p>\n

DNA’n\u0131n yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ke\u015ffinin 50. y\u0131l\u0131 olan 2003’te Brenda Maddox taraf\u0131ndan yaz\u0131lan Rosalind Franklin biyografisi, eski olmayan (yay\u0131m tarihi 2001) bir kitaba at\u0131fta bulunuyor. Bryan Sykes, bu kitapta DNA’n\u0131n yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ke\u015ffedilmesini anlat\u0131yor: “DNA’n\u0131n uzun kristal fiberleri haz\u0131rlan\u0131r. K\u0131r\u0131lan X-\u0131\u015f\u0131nlar\u0131 foto\u011fraf filmi \u00fczerinde baz\u0131 noktalar olu\u015fturur. Uzun s\u00fcre modeller olu\u015fturmak \u00fczere \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan Watson ve Crick birdenbire X-\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131ndaki motifine uyan bir model olu\u015fturur.”<\/p>\n

DNA’n\u0131n uzun kristal fiberlerini kim haz\u0131rlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r? Bu foto\u011fraf\u0131 kim \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir? Bu foto\u011fraf kime aittir? Watson ve Crick bu foto\u011fraf\u0131 nas\u0131l g\u00f6r\u00fcr? 2001 y\u0131l\u0131nda bir yazar, hala bu ger\u00e7eklerin \u00f6znesini belirtmeden ba\u015far\u0131y\u0131 iki isme y\u00fckleyiverebilmektedir.<\/p>\n

James Watson anlat\u0131lan olaylar \u00fczerinden y\u0131llar ge\u00e7tikten sonra bile, hala kendini hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karmak i\u00e7in u\u011fra\u015facakt\u0131r. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratuvar\u0131 Ba\u015fkan\u0131 olarak Harvard’da verdi\u011fi bir konferansta, “Ortal\u0131kta bir efsane dola\u015f\u0131yor” deyiverir; “Sanki ben ve Francis DNA datas\u0131n\u0131 King’s Koleji’nden \u00e7alm\u0131\u015f\u0131z gibi. Gidip \u00e7ekmecesinden \u00e7almad\u0131m, Rosalind Franklin’in X-ray foto\u011fraf\u0131 (M. Wilkins taraf\u0131ndan) bana g\u00f6sterildi, boyutlar s\u00f6ylendi, 34 angstromluk tekrarlar oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenince, bunun az \u00e7ok ne oldu\u011funu anlad\u0131m. Ama ger\u00e7ekten de anahtar olay Franklin’in foto\u011fraf\u0131yd\u0131.”<\/p>\n

Bu ger\u00e7ekten b\u00f6yle olabilirdi, ama bir s\u00fcre sonra Rosalind Franklin’le kolaboratif \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yapt\u0131klar\u0131 d\u00f6nemde bile, bu durum ona a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131. Crick de ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde Rosalind Franklin’in X-\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 foto\u011fraf\u0131na at\u0131fta bulunmad\u0131. \u00c7e\u015fitli yay\u0131nlar\u0131nda Wilkins ve Franklin’in isimleri birlikte an\u0131ld\u0131 ve King’s Koleji ekibi olarak s\u00f6z edildi kendilerinden.<\/p>\n

\"\"Cad\u0131’ya ne yapsan mubah!
\n<\/em><\/strong>Peki, Watson neden Franklin’i bir cad\u0131 olarak g\u00f6stermek istedi \u0130kili Sarmal<\/em> kitab\u0131nda? Maddox’a g\u00f6re, bu b\u00fcy\u00fck bir olas\u0131l\u0131kla Watson’\u0131n su\u00e7luluk duygusunu yok edebilmek i\u00e7in yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir mazeretti. \u00d6yle d\u00fc\u015fmanl\u0131k dolu ve yard\u0131mla\u015fmaya a\u00e7\u0131k olmayan bir insand\u0131 ki Franklin, \u00f6yle birinden \u00e7almak adeta mubah say\u0131labilirdi.<\/p>\n

Biyokimyac\u0131 Gunther Stent, Lawrence Kohlberg’in Be\u015fparas\u0131z Heinz ve K\u00f6t\u00fc Uyu\u015fturucu Sat\u0131c\u0131s\u0131<\/em> \u00f6yk\u00fcs\u00fcndeki ahlaki ikilemi \u0130kili Sarmal<\/em> kitab\u0131ndaki Rosy (ki Rosalind Franklin bu k\u0131saltmadan hi\u00e7 ho\u015flanmazd\u0131) karakteriyle e\u015f tutuyor: \u0130yi bir e\u015f, korkun\u00e7 uyu\u015fturucu sat\u0131c\u0131s\u0131ndan ilac\u0131 \u00e7alarak e\u015finin hayat\u0131n\u0131 kurtar\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Feminist bir yakla\u015f\u0131mla, DNA’n\u0131n modellenmesi \u00f6yk\u00fcs\u00fcndeki “Rosy” karakteri eski bir kli\u015fenin anlat\u0131m\u0131d\u0131r: “Bunu o istedi, bunu hak ediyordu zaten.”<\/p>\n

\u0130kili Sarmal<\/em>‘la bitmeyecekti Franklin’in a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lanmas\u0131. Baz\u0131 kaynaklarda iyi bir deneyci (experimentalist) olarak an\u0131lmaya ba\u015flad\u0131. Evet, Franklin iyi deneyler kuruyor, iyi deneyler yap\u0131yordu ama; onlar\u0131 yorumlayabilecek kadar iyi bir bilim insan\u0131 de\u011fildi. Yetenekleri ve zek\u00e2s\u0131n\u0131n \u00fczerine bir \u00e7izgi \u00e7ekiliyordu.<\/p>\n

\u00dcstelik Crick 1979’da yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 Alt\u0131n Bir Sarmalla Ya\u015famak<\/em> kitab\u0131nda Rosalind Franklin’den \u015f\u00f6yle s\u00f6z ediyordu: “Rosalind’in ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zorluklar ve ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131klar\u0131 hep kendi yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feylerdir. \u00c7ok duyarl\u0131yd\u0131 ve bilimsel olarak tam tam\u0131na do\u011fru olmak u\u011fruna kestirme yollara sapmay\u0131 reddediyordu. Kendi kendine ba\u015far\u0131ya ula\u015fmay\u0131 akl\u0131na koymu\u015ftu, \u00f6\u011f\u00fct almay\u0131 reddediyor, inat\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k ediyordu.”<\/p>\n

Ancak Merring’le ve Klug’la ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi kolaborasyonlar, Franklin’in tek ba\u015f\u0131na ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olmak i\u00e7in bir gayreti olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ortak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmay\u0131 da ba\u015far\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirebildi\u011fini g\u00f6sterir.<\/p>\n

1920-1957 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki k\u0131sa ya\u015fam\u0131nda \u00f6nce karbon kimyas\u0131yla ba\u015flay\u0131p DNA’n\u0131n kristal yap\u0131s\u0131yla devam eden ve t\u00fct\u00fcn mozaik vir\u00fcs\u00fc \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131yla bilime \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli katk\u0131larda bulunan, ancak ya\u015fam\u0131 erken sonlanan Rosalind Franklin i\u00e7in “molek\u00fcler biyolojinin Sylvia Plath’\u0131” benzetmesi yap\u0131l\u0131yor. Bir yerde bir yanl\u0131\u015f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, Rosalind Franklin ataerkil laboratuvar d\u00fcnyas\u0131na kurban edilmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, ama art\u0131k bilim tarihi do\u011fru anlat\u0131lmak zorunda. DNA tarihinde baz\u0131 yanl\u0131\u015flar var ve art\u0131k bunlar\u0131n konu\u015fulmas\u0131 gerekiyor.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015far\u0131ya ula\u015fmak i\u00e7in her yol kabul edilebilir mi? Ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n verilerine izinsiz eri\u015ferek bir sonuca ula\u015fmak ne anlama geliyor? Bu yanl\u0131\u015f\u0131 me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131rmak i\u00e7in \u00f6zneyi unutturmak veya k\u00f6t\u00fclemek, de\u011ferini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak kabul edilebilir mi?<\/p>\n

B\u00fcy\u00fck bilimsel bulu\u015flar\u0131n \u00e7evresini saran insan \u00f6\u011fesi ve beraberinde gelen etik sorunlar, bilimsel verinin niteli\u011fini eksiltmiyor ku\u015fkusuz. 20. y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n en \u00f6nemli bulu\u015flar\u0131ndan biri DNA’n\u0131n yap\u0131s\u0131 ve onun \u00e7o\u011falma mekanizmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesidir. Ancak onun \u00e7evresinde ya\u015fanan etik tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6rt\u00fclmemesi gerekir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc etik sorunlar, bilimsel \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n \u00e7evresinden merkezine do\u011fru hareket ediverir. Bir bakars\u0131n\u0131z, bilim, insan ve do\u011fay\u0131 anlamak ve korumak amac\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131k\u0131vermi\u015f; etik ilkelerin unutuldu\u011fu bir bilimsel ortam yava\u015f yava\u015f bask\u0131n k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcn aleti haline gelivermi\u015f.<\/p>\n

Kad\u0131n ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olunca…
\n<\/em><\/strong>E\u011fer bilim d\u00fcnyas\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7inde bir ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131ysan\u0131z, \u00e7evrenize bak\u0131n. Kimleri g\u00f6receksiniz? 1950’lerin Londra’s\u0131ndan bu yana neler de\u011fi\u015fmi\u015f, neler de\u011fi\u015fmemi\u015f? E\u011fer bilim d\u00fcnyas\u0131n\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaysan\u0131z, yine \u00e7evrenize bak\u0131n. \u00c7evrenizdeki g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc, i\u015flerinde ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 kad\u0131nlara bak\u0131n. Sizce tiplemelerde bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik var m\u0131? Yoksa Rosalind Franklin i\u00e7in kurulan bir tiplemeye benzetilen ki\u015filer var m\u0131 \u00e7evrenizde? Profesyonel ya\u015famdaki ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 kad\u0131n portreleri hep birbirine benziyor. Hepsi sanki bir kal\u0131ptan d\u00f6k\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f gibi. Bu sizce m\u00fcmk\u00fcn m\u00fc? Yoksa d\u00fcnyada ge\u00e7erli olan ataerkil toplum yap\u0131s\u0131 ve bu yap\u0131ya s\u0131ms\u0131k\u0131 sar\u0131lan ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131z erkekler ve ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131z kad\u0131nlar Rosalindler’in \u00fczerine bir kal\u0131p d\u00f6kerek, onlar\u0131 bize ayn\u0131ym\u0131\u015f gibi mi g\u00f6stermeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor? Ne zaman uyanaca\u011f\u0131z?<\/p>\n

KAYNAKLAR
\n<\/strong>1) Brenda Maddox, “Rosalind Franklin: The Dark Lady of DNA”, Harper Collins, 2003.
\n2) Ann Sayre, “Rosalind Franklin and DNA”, WW Norton and Company, 1975.
\n3) Bryan Sykes, “Seven Daughters of Eve”, Cygnus Software Ltd., 2001.
\n4) JD Watson, The Double Helix<\/em>, 1968.
\n5) JD Watson, \u0130kili Sarmal<\/em>, Yazko Bilim, 1983.
\n6) JD Watson, \u0130kili Sarmal<\/em>, T\u00dcB\u0130TAK Yay\u0131nlar\u0131.
\n7) JD Watson, FHC Crick, “Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids”, Nature<\/em> 171, 1953, s.737.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

DNA yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesinde hep iki isim an\u0131l\u0131r: Watson ve Crick. Oysa g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilen bir ba\u015fka isim daha vard\u0131r: Rosalind Franklin. Yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 katk\u0131 unutturulmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, hatta giderek a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Erkekler d\u00fcnyas\u0131n\u0131n kurban\u0131 olmu\u015ftur bu kad\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131rmac\u0131… Prof. Dr. Benan Din\u00e7t\u00fcrk \u0130T\u00dc Molek\u00fcler Biyoloji ve Genetik M\u00fchendisli\u011fi B\u00f6l\u00fcm Ba\u015fkan\u0131 1953 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Nisan ay\u0131nda Nature dergisinde yay\u0131mlanan tek […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24,"featured_media":42558,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,21,231],"tags":[272,292,205],"class_list":["post-8736","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-1-sayi","category-biyoloji","category-molekuler-biyoloji-ve-genetik","tag-dna","tag-genetik","tag-mikrobiyoloji"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8736","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8736"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8736\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42558"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bilimvegelecek.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}